Background: Automated segmentation of spinal MR images plays a vital role both scientifically and clinically. However, accurately delineating posterior spine structures presents challenges. Methods: This retrospective study, approved by the ethical committee, involved translating T1w and T2w MR image series into CT images in a total of n=263 pairs of CT/MR series. Landmark-based registration was performed to align image pairs. We compared 2D paired (Pix2Pix, denoising diffusion implicit models (DDIM) image mode, DDIM noise mode) and unpaired (contrastive unpaired translation, SynDiff) image-to-image translation using "peak signal to noise ratio" (PSNR) as quality measure. A publicly available segmentation network segmented the synthesized CT datasets, and Dice scores were evaluated on in-house test sets and the "MRSpineSeg Challenge" volumes. The 2D findings were extended to 3D Pix2Pix and DDIM. Results: 2D paired methods and SynDiff exhibited similar translation performance and Dice scores on paired data. DDIM image mode achieved the highest image quality. SynDiff, Pix2Pix, and DDIM image mode demonstrated similar Dice scores (0.77). For craniocaudal axis rotations, at least two landmarks per vertebra were required for registration. The 3D translation outperformed the 2D approach, resulting in improved Dice scores (0.80) and anatomically accurate segmentations in a higher resolution than the original MR image. Conclusion: Two landmarks per vertebra registration enabled paired image-to-image translation from MR to CT and outperformed all unpaired approaches. The 3D techniques provided anatomically correct segmentations, avoiding underprediction of small structures like the spinous process.