Segment anything model (SAM), as the name suggests, is claimed to be capable of cutting out any object and demonstrates impressive zero-shot transfer performance with the guidance of prompts. However, there is currently a lack of comprehensive evaluation regarding its robustness under various corruptions. Understanding the robustness of SAM across different corruption scenarios is crucial for its real-world deployment. Prior works show that SAM is biased towards texture (style) rather than shape, motivated by which we start by investigating its robustness against style transfer, which is synthetic corruption. Following by interpreting the effects of synthetic corruption as style changes, we proceed to conduct a comprehensive evaluation for its robustness against 15 types of common corruption. These corruptions mainly fall into categories such as digital, noise, weather, and blur, and within each corruption category, we explore 5 severity levels to simulate real-world corruption scenarios. Beyond the corruptions, we further assess the robustness of SAM against local occlusion and local adversarial patch attacks. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first of its kind to evaluate the robustness of SAM under style change, local occlusion, and local adversarial patch attacks. Given that patch attacks visible to human eyes are easily detectable, we further assess its robustness against global adversarial attacks that are imperceptible to human eyes. Overall, this work provides a comprehensive empirical study of the robustness of SAM, evaluating its performance under various corruptions and extending the assessment to critical aspects such as local occlusion, local adversarial patch attacks, and global adversarial attacks. These evaluations yield valuable insights into the practical applicability and effectiveness of SAM in addressing real-world challenges.