Data augmentation strategies are actively used when training deep neural networks (DNNs). Recent studies suggest that they are effective at various tasks. However, the effect of data augmentation on DNNs' interpretability is not yet widely investigated. In this paper, we explore the relationship between interpretability and data augmentation strategy in which models are trained with different data augmentation methods and are evaluated in terms of interpretability. To quantify the interpretability, we devise three evaluation methods based on alignment with humans, faithfulness to the model, and the number of human-recognizable concepts in the model. Comprehensive experiments show that models trained with mixed sample data augmentation show lower interpretability, especially for CutMix and SaliencyMix augmentations. This new finding suggests that it is important to carefully adopt mixed sample data augmentation due to the impact on model interpretability, especially in mission-critical applications.