To date, several automated strategies for identification/segmentation of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) lesions with the use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) have been presented but they are either outperformed by human experts or perform differently from them. This is mainly due to the ambiguity originated by MRI instabilities, peculiar variability of MS and unspecific nature of MRI with respect to MS. Physicians partially manage the uncertainty generated by ambiguity relying on their personal radiological/clinical/anatomical background and experience. We present an automated framework based on three pivotal concepts to better emulate human reasoning: 1. the modelling of uncertainty; 2. the proposal of two, separately trained, CNN, one optimized with respect to lesions themselves and the other to the environment surrounding lesions, respectively repeated for axial, coronal and sagittal directions; 3. the definition of an ensemble classifier to merge the information collected by all CNN. The proposed framework is trained, validated and tested on the 2016 MSSEG benchmark public data set from a single imaging modality, the FLuid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR). The comparison, made with the consensus (the ground-truth) between 7 human raters and with each of the 7 human raters, proves that there is no significant difference between the automated and the human raters. The results of our framework concerning the uncertainty are also reported, even if a comparison with the raters is impossible because they don't recognize this class.