To achieve reliable, robust, and safe AI systems it is important to implement fallback strategies when AI predictions cannot be trusted. Certifiers for neural networks are a reliable way to check the robustness of these predictions. They guarantee for some predictions that a certain class of manipulations or attacks could not have changed the outcome. For the remaining predictions without guarantees, the method abstains from making a prediction and a fallback strategy needs to be invoked, which typically incurs additional costs, can require a human operator, or even fail to provide any prediction. While this is a key concept towards safe and secure AI, we show for the first time that this approach comes with its own security risks, as such fallback strategies can be deliberately triggered by an adversary. Using training-time attacks, the adversary can significantly reduce the certified robustness of the model, making it unavailable. This transfers the main system load onto the fallback, reducing the overall system's integrity and availability. We design two novel backdoor attacks which show the practical relevance of these threats. For example, adding 1% poisoned data during training is sufficient to reduce certified robustness by up to 95 percentage points. Our extensive experiments across multiple datasets, model architectures, and certifiers demonstrate the wide applicability of these attacks. A first investigation into potential defenses shows that current approaches are insufficient to mitigate the issue, highlighting the need for new, more specific solutions.