When humans solve complex problems, they rarely come up with a decision right-away. Instead, they start with an intuitive decision, reflect upon it, spot mistakes, resolve contradictions and jump between different hypotheses. Thus, they create a sequence of ideas and follow a train of thought that ultimately reaches a conclusive decision. Contrary to this, today's neural classification models are mostly trained to map an input to one single and fixed output. In this paper, we investigate how we can give models the opportunity of a second, third and k-th thought. We take inspiration from Hegel's dialectics and propose a method that turns an existing classifier's class prediction (such as the image class forest) into a sequence of predictions (such as forest → tree → mushroom). Concretely, we propose a correction module that is trained to estimate the model's correctness as well as an iterative prediction update based on the prediction's gradient. Our approach results in a dynamic system over class probability distributions x2014 the thought flow. We evaluate our method on diverse datasets and tasks from computer vision and natural language processing. We observe surprisingly complex but intuitive behavior and demonstrate that our method (i) can correct misclassifications, (ii) strengthens model performance, (iii) is robust to high levels of adversarial attacks, (iv) can increase accuracy up to 4% in a label-distribution-shift setting and (iv) provides a tool for model interpretability that uncovers model knowledge which otherwise remains invisible in a single distribution prediction.