Two DL models were developed using radiograph-level annotations (yes or no disease) and fine-grained lesion-level annotations (lesion bounding boxes), respectively named CheXNet and CheXDet. The models' internal classification performance and lesion localization performance were compared on a testing set (n=2,922), external classification performance was compared on NIH-Google (n=4,376) and PadChest (n=24,536) datasets, and external lesion localization performance was compared on NIH-ChestX-ray14 dataset (n=880). The models were also compared to radiologists on a subset of the internal testing set (n=496). Given sufficient training data, both models performed comparably to radiologists. CheXDet achieved significant improvement for external classification, such as in classifying fracture on NIH-Google (CheXDet area under the ROC curve [AUC]: 0.67, CheXNet AUC: 0.51; p<.001) and PadChest (CheXDet AUC: 0.78, CheXNet AUC: 0.55; p<.001). CheXDet achieved higher lesion detection performance than CheXNet for most abnormalities on all datasets, such as in detecting pneumothorax on the internal set (CheXDet jacknife alternative free-response ROC-figure of merit [JAFROC-FOM]: 0.87, CheXNet JAFROC-FOM: 0.13; p<.001) and NIH-ChestX-ray14 (CheXDet JAFROC-FOM: 0.55, CheXNet JAFROC-FOM: 0.04; p<.001). To summarize, fine-grained annotations overcame shortcut learning and enabled DL models to identify correct lesion patterns, improving the models' generalizability.