Modern deep neural networks are highly over-parameterized compared to the data on which they are trained, yet they often generalize remarkably well. A flurry of recent work has asked: why do deep networks not overfit to their training data? We investigate the hypothesis that deeper nets are implicitly biased to find lower rank solutions and that these are the solutions that generalize well. We prove for the asymptotic case that the percent volume of low effective-rank solutions increases monotonically as linear neural networks are made deeper. We then show empirically that our claim holds true on finite width models. We further empirically find that a similar result holds for non-linear networks: deeper non-linear networks learn a feature space whose kernel has a lower rank. We further demonstrate how linear over-parameterization of deep non-linear models can be used to induce low-rank bias, improving generalization performance without changing the effective model capacity. We evaluate on various model architectures and demonstrate that linearly over-parameterized models outperform existing baselines on image classification tasks, including ImageNet.