Adversarial training, especially projected gradient descent (PGD), has been a successful approach for improving robustness against adversarial attacks. After adversarial training, gradients of models with respect to their inputs have a preferential direction. However, the direction of alignment is not mathematically well established, making it difficult to evaluate quantitatively. We propose a novel definition of this direction as the direction of the vector pointing toward the closest point of the support of the closest inaccurate class in decision space. To evaluate the alignment with this direction after adversarial training, we apply a metric that uses generative adversarial networks to produce the smallest residual needed to change the class present in the image. We show that PGD-trained models have a higher alignment than the baseline according to our definition, that our metric presents higher alignment values than a competing metric formulation, and that enforcing this alignment increases the robustness of models.